Is re-sentencing for ‘juvenile lifers’ justice served, or justice stolen?

You do the crime, you do the time. But what happens when the Supreme Court rules that time can be unconstitutional?

As Pennsylvania grapples with re-sentencing requirements for juveniles who got mandatory life in prison, Dennis Owens, Amanda St. Hilaire, Kendra Nichols take this episode of On Deadline to unpack the rationale behind the court rulings, the emotional next steps for victims’ families, why Pennsylvania has more juvenile lifers than any other state, and how our current criminal justice system shapes other aspects of our community. They sit down with law student La Tasha Williams, whose passion is the plight of juvenile lifers, and Frank Vaccaro, whose brother-in-law was 11 when a 16-year-old neighbor sexually assaulted and murdered him in Cumberland County.

Subscribe to On Deadline in Apple Podcasts (iTunes), on your Android, or wherever you get your podcasts. You can also listen on StitcherTuneIn, or in the player above.

Write a reviewsend us an email, or message us on Facebook to share your thoughts or suggest a topic for discussion. You can also record voice memos and email them to us at theinvestigators@abc27.com. 

Below are links and references from this week’s episode:

1 thought on “Is re-sentencing for ‘juvenile lifers’ justice served, or justice stolen?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s